 |
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
 Global Regulatory ServicesDate: 14/04/09 The Herbal Directive – is it the proverbial 'sledgehammer to crack a nut'?This was the question raised at the Keynote Theatre at the Natural & Organic Products Europe Show held at Olympia in London earlier this month.
Unfortunately, there were only 40 minutes to have a debate on this subject and with feelings running high, there wasn't nearly enough time to give the subject justice.
The panel of four, who each spoke from their perspective, did represent a good cross section of the industry: Sue Croft of the Consumers for Health Choice; Lynn Lord of Natures Aid; Sebastian Pole of Pukka Herbs and Jen Tan of A.Vogel/Bioforce. Lynn and Jen were both resigned to the Herbal Directive, however, they did put a positive spin on it saying that, overall, the principles of the directive were good.
Jen Tan (A.Vogel/Bioforce) stated that they had established good procedures (such as Good Manufacturing Practice) right from the outset so meeting the criteria of quality was not an issue. He realised, however, that many companies had not had the same foresight and therefore, would struggle to comply. He also highlighted the fact that many physicians want to use herbal remedies but have no idea how and whether or not there may be possible interactions with conventional medication etc. With the new directive coming into force by the end of April 2011, information in the form of Patient Information Leaflets, correct labelling and other supporting data will be readily available. This information will prove to be most useful for educating our physicians as well as the patients themselves thereby improving patient safety.
Lynn Lord (Natures Aid) highlighted the scale of costs involved in registering a herbal medicine: to compile a dossier is likely to cost a minimum of £20,000 with these costs being dependent on the number and complexity of the active ingredients involved. On top of this there are the registration fees payable to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) which are for the initial submission and then maintenance of the herbal licence thereafter. For one product alone you probably won't get much change from £50,000!
Sebastian Pole (Pukka Herbs) felt very strongly that this legislation had been imposed on the industry and that it was definitely the proverbial "sledgehammer to crack a nut". In his opinion many herbal companies will simply close their doors in April 2011 resulting in the loss of numerous effective herbal remedies. In his opinion the directive was completely unwieldy and would spell doom for the herbal industry.
Sue Croft (Consumers for Health Choice) passionately put forward her case that members of the public should have choice. In her opinion, the herbal directive was too restrictive and inflexible which will result in many herbal companies being unable to comply. This in turn will take away the consumers right to have a choice, denying them access to the very herbal remedies they had chosen to take.
All four representatives were in agreement, however, that there was a need for some form of regulation in order to gain and maintain the confidence of the consumer. The extent of these regulations, however, was hotly disputed.
Greer Deal, Director of Global Regulatory Services, asked the panel about the 30/15 year rule i.e. a herbal remedy must demonstrate at least 30 years of traditional use with 15 of those years being within Europe. Bearing in mind Indian and Chinese traditional herbal medicines, she wondered if the panel thought it would make a difference if this rule was amended or even removed altogether. The panel were united in their response: yes, this one amendment would make a significant difference to the herbal industry. Jen Tan (A.Vogel/Bioforce) went on to say that the MHRA were becoming more lenient on this rule so if a company cannot comply with the 30/15 year rule this doesn't mean the end of their product as they may still be able to license their remedy through effective negotiation and communication. Not all EU Health Authorities are so understanding.
The key messages from this debate were as follows:
· the MHRA are more lenient with regards to the 30/15 year rule than other European Health Authorities.
· Herbal companies who do not have good procedures in place such as Good Manufacturing Practice will have their work cut out for them in order to comply.
· As of May 2011 if a herbal remedy doesn't have a licence it will be illegal to sell it and will have to be removed from the market.
· To ensure that licences are obtained in time for the April 2011 deadline (and to continue trading), companies need to submit their applications in June/July this year.
· To obtain a licence is costly, however, companies will end up with a more robust product and will soon get a return on their investment.
· Everyone agrees that the herbal industry should be regulated but the extent of this regulation continues to be debated.
About Global Regulatory Services (GRS):
We are a full service regulatory affairs consultancy based in the UK offering resource, support and advice to lifescience companies worldwide. We have established an extensive network of well over 4,000 consultants and associates throughout the world with particularly strong connections in Europe, America, Canada and Asia. Our professionals are all very experienced with many of them being leaders in their own field ranging from Traditional Herbal Medicines through to Stem Cell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine.
###
If you would like more information about Global Regulatory Services please visit www.globalregulatoryservices.com
or call Copyright Cambridge Network 2010
|
About this section
Cambridge Network keeps you informed of all the latest news from Cambridge and beyond.
News articles posted on our site by our members are picked up by Search engines and News Services such as GoogleNews and can drive traffic back to you. If you have a special interest, use one of the news filters in the left hand panel or try out the site search engine which can also source articles from our archive dating back to 2000. Wherever your interest lies, you will find this site a plentiful source of the most up-to-date news. Sign up on the front page of our site to receive our weekly e-newsletter with a digest of the latest news from Cambridge |
|